The recent slaughter of women and children by pro-Syrian government forces has captured world attention. Even the suggestion that Greece will leave the European Union, default on its loans, and produce an economic freefall has everyone anxiously eyeing the stock market. Worried atomic energy monitors are taking a hard look at Iran. And here at home, Americans are fretfully looking for a leader.
During one particularly hard time in Israel, Isaiah rebuked them: “Do not anxiously look around” (41:10). Jesus said the days before the Rapture would be anxious ones—just like now. And people are certainly looking around anxiously. “When all these things begin to happen, stand and look up, for your salvation is near” (Luke 21:28). Unlike the earth dwellers who are anxiously looking around, we should be expectantly looking up.
Somewhat paradoxically, even though Jesus said no one knows the day or hour of His return, He told us to be looking for it. “For you know quite well that the day of the Lord's return will come unexpectedly, like a thief in the night...[but] you must be ready all the time, for the Son of Man will come in the clouds when least expected” (Matt. 24:30, 43). The world is a mess! We can either look around anxiously or look up expectantly.
Wednesday, May 30, 2012
Monday, May 28, 2012
Living Memorials
A “living memorial”—is it an oxymoron? After all, a ‘memorial’ service honors the dead, memorializing the departed. A few people who’ve lived extraordinary lives are deemed important enough to be memorialized in perpetuity by having cities or schools named after them, or even by monument. Today, we remember our citizen soldiers, who by unwanted circumstance, sacrificed their lives for freedom, their only monument a headstone. But headstones and statues are as dead as the people they represent.
For the first 12 years of my life, my family attended a church called “Memorial Baptist.” Looking back now, I think there was irony in its name—it was kind of a dead church. What a shame. Jesus is the Head of the Church; it is His Body. And He is not the 'Head of the dead.' If anything, that little Baptist church should have been called the “Living Memorial Baptist”—a witnesses to the transforming power of His life, death, resurrection and ascension.
Ultimately, that is what a memorial is—a witness to someone’s life. And of course Jesus’ Church is that witness, made up of individual living memorials or witnesses—members who died to this world, but are alive in Christ. Paul called us to be “living sacrifices” (Rom. 12:1)—daily dying to self that we might show the world who Christ is. What a good day this is to remind ourselves that we are, in fact, living memorials to show "life" to a dying world.
Labels:
dying,
dying to live,
dying to self,
eternal life,
forget to remember,
life,
new life,
remember,
reminder,
sacrifice,
witness
Friday, May 25, 2012
Do You Love Me?
Yesterday, I wrote that the joy of pleasing God, and feeling His pleasure, can be hindered if we live by do's and don'ts. Rule keeping just puts you in bondage. What's needed is to be so in love with Jesus we wouldn’t think of displeasing Him. Isn’t this what Jesus said? “If you love me, you will keep my commandments.” (John 14:21) In other words, the more we love Him, the easier it is to obey Him.
If we are struggling to be obedient in some area of our lives, we don’t need to double-down our efforts. We need to reassess our intimacy with Jesus. Obedience is the ‘natural’ consequence of love. “This is love for God: to obey his commands. And [then] His commands are not burdensome.” (1 John 5:3)
Peter’s relationship with Jesus illustrates this proper order: love followed by obedience. Peter, who was the staunchest warrior among the disciples, declared his loyalty—he would never abandon Jesus. And then, he did (John 18). And not simply running away as the others had, but stridently disavowing Jesus—3 times! So it should not miss our attention that when Jesus and Peter had their next private encounter, Jesus did not tell Peter to try harder. No, Jesus simply looked him in the eyes, and said, “Peter, do you love me?”
If we are struggling to be obedient in some area of our lives, we don’t need to double-down our efforts. We need to reassess our intimacy with Jesus. Obedience is the ‘natural’ consequence of love. “This is love for God: to obey his commands. And [then] His commands are not burdensome.” (1 John 5:3)
Peter’s relationship with Jesus illustrates this proper order: love followed by obedience. Peter, who was the staunchest warrior among the disciples, declared his loyalty—he would never abandon Jesus. And then, he did (John 18). And not simply running away as the others had, but stridently disavowing Jesus—3 times! So it should not miss our attention that when Jesus and Peter had their next private encounter, Jesus did not tell Peter to try harder. No, Jesus simply looked him in the eyes, and said, “Peter, do you love me?”
Labels:
commandment,
follow Jesus,
Jesus,
love,
love of God,
obey,
Peter,
please Him,
pleasing,
well pleased
Thursday, May 24, 2012
Feeling God’s Pleasure
If you’ve seen the film Chariots of Fire, you know that Eric Liddell was the Scottish missionary who won a gold medal in the 1924 Olympics. But for Eric, running wasn't about winning competitions. It was how he connected to God. “I believe God made me for a purpose, but he also made me fast. And when I run I feel His pleasure.”
Twice, our Heavenly Father was so moved with love for Jesus that He broke through the heavens, speaking right out of eternity, “This is my beloved son in whom I am well pleased.” Just think how different our lives would be if we could live continually knowing, and yes, even feeling, God’s pleasure.
It seems to me that “feeling God’s pleasure” is the end product of “pleasing God” (Eph. 5:8: 1 Thess. 4:1). But we can inadvertently put so much emphasis on ‘doing’ things to please Him we miss out on the joy that Eric had discovered. Certainly Jesus wants us to be “doers of the Word” (James 1:22). But motivated by love, and to know the same love with which God loved Him (John 17:26).
Twice, our Heavenly Father was so moved with love for Jesus that He broke through the heavens, speaking right out of eternity, “This is my beloved son in whom I am well pleased.” Just think how different our lives would be if we could live continually knowing, and yes, even feeling, God’s pleasure.
Labels:
beloved son,
chariots,
eric Liddell,
feelings,
please Him,
pleasure,
purpose,
race,
run,
well pleased
Wednesday, May 23, 2012
"The Church of What’s Happening Now”
Today, in the spirit of relevance, churches design services to be less assaulting to un-churched persons—lighting, music style, and technology meld together for a sensory experience. Dan Kimball of the Vintage Church says, “While the seeker-friendly era was successful in bringing a generation of baby-boomers to Jesus, that time is past. Now we need to find new methods that will reach this new generation."
The new churches keep things chill, friendly, entertaining, avoiding anything that would scare people away. But will "The Church of What's Happening Now" be one that keeps His word, honors His name, and stands up for sound doctrine without compromise? Certainly, the goal of each new generation is to communicate the Gospel in a way that can be understood by theirs. The challenge ahead for them is in refusing to compromise with the culture, that is, making changes while still making disciples.
Friday, May 18, 2012
Are You Prepared?
Though 87% of Americans believe they’ll go to heaven, few are planning and preparing for it. If it is normal for people to plan for the future, shouldn't it be normal for Christians to plan for heaven?
‘What does that mean?’ Well, Jesus said “I’m going to prepare a place for you.” But there are two sides to that! Throughout the NT letters, we are told that life on earth is preparation for eternity, and only “those who endure will reign with Him” (2 Tim 2:12). Though all who are saved will go to heaven, what kind of place we will occupy is yet to be determined, “For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ that each one may receive what is due him for the things done while in the body, whether good or bad… on that day, fire will reveal what kind of work each builder has done, and will show if a person's work has any value. If the work survives, that builder will receive a reward. But if the work is burned up, the builder will suffer great loss. The builder will be saved, but like someone barely escaping through a wall of flames” (2 Cor. 5:10; 1 Cor. 3:13-15).
Though we say we believe this, our actions often suggest otherwise. We spend our entire lives making plans: we plan for our college education, plan our career, plan our marriage and family. Then we hire financial planners, in preparation for retirement and death. Some people even plan their own funerals. But what about your heavenly plans? Are you prepared?
Though we say we believe this, our actions often suggest otherwise. We spend our entire lives making plans: we plan for our college education, plan our career, plan our marriage and family. Then we hire financial planners, in preparation for retirement and death. Some people even plan their own funerals. But what about your heavenly plans? Are you prepared?
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
“Distracted walking may cost you”
Enlightened Christians will perceive the double meaning of the above title from an article in USA Today. Many States have laws against texting and talking while driving; but now States are making it illegal to text and talk while walking. Some are issuing fines for careless walking. More proactively, the state of Delaware posts warning signs near crosswalks, “Look Up: Drivers aren’t always looking out for you.”
In Scripture, walking is a metaphor for the Christian life. From the first pages, God and Adam walk together in Eden. Thereafter, walking depicts the choice of right over wrong, God over self. With that backdrop, Paul says “be careful how you walk” (Eph 5:15), the word “careful” meaning cautiously, guardedly. Interestingly, the Greek word is "akribos" from which we get our English word “acrobat”—one who walks a straight and narrow line or tight rope.
There are many distractions to make us stumble or fall. The prevention is not unlike Delaware's: Look up! In Biblical language, “Lift up your eyes” (Is. 51:6); “Fix your eyes on Jesus” (Heb. 12:2); “Do not anxiously look about you” (Is. 41:10). And most importantly, be careful when you are walking in the dark. Jesus said, “Those who walk in the darkness cannot see where they are going” (John 12:35). So, Paul says: “At one time you were darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Walk as children of light” (Eph. 5:8).
Tuesday, May 15, 2012
Hope against Hope
Last week, pollsters said 43% of Americans have little hope the economy will improve any time soon. Today, a poll in USA Today says two-thirds of Americans are hopeful the economy will improve within the next year. What does this tell us? First, not to trust in polls, and second, “hope” is subjective.
The Bible says “deferred hope makes the heart sick” (Prov. 13:12). Hardly unique to our generation, hopelessness has characterized humanity since Adam and Eve hoped for the better things Satan promised! Hoping in anything but God (banks, stock market, government, or people) promises disappointment.

God calls us to a hope founded on His integrity, promising “a hope that does not disappoint.” Listen to this translation of Romans 5:3-5, from “The Message.” We continue to shout our praise even when we're hemmed in with troubles, because we know how troubles can develop passionate patience in us, and how that patience in turn forges the tempered steel of virtue, keeping us alert for whatever God will do next. In alert expectancy such as this, we're never left feeling shortchanged. Quite the contrary—we can't round up enough containers to hold everything God generously pours into our lives through the Holy Spirit!
Monday, May 14, 2012
Obama Invokes the Golden Rule
Last week, the President invoked the Golden Rule to justify his endorsement of gay marriage, implying 1) it was the “Christian” thing to do, and 2) it is what Jesus would do! The phrase “Golden Rule” is not in the Bible, but the principle is: “Therefore, however you want people to treat you, so treat them” (Matt. 7:12).
Certainly Jesus never intended the Golden Rule to be the litmus test for right behavior—and certainly not as a license to sin. And He certainly would not have approved gay marriage. How can we know this? Because Jesus defined marriage for us in Matthew 19:4-5: “Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, 'For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and the two shall become one flesh?’”
Parsing scripture to gain moral ground is nothing new. People have been splicing and dicing God's Word for their own purposes ever since the Serpent first did it to Eve. (Centuries later, he tried the same strategy (Luke 4) on Jesus.) The Body of Christ has never been in greater need of those who can “accurately handle the word of truth” (2 Tim. 2:15).
Certainly Jesus never intended the Golden Rule to be the litmus test for right behavior—and certainly not as a license to sin. And He certainly would not have approved gay marriage. How can we know this? Because Jesus defined marriage for us in Matthew 19:4-5: “Have you not read that He who created them from the beginning made them male and female, and said, 'For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and the two shall become one flesh?’”
Parsing scripture to gain moral ground is nothing new. People have been splicing and dicing God's Word for their own purposes ever since the Serpent first did it to Eve. (Centuries later, he tried the same strategy (Luke 4) on Jesus.) The Body of Christ has never been in greater need of those who can “accurately handle the word of truth” (2 Tim. 2:15).
Wednesday, May 9, 2012
Obama's position on gay marriage has evolved
Yesterday President Obama announced his support of gay marriage. His position had been evolving for several years. To “evolve” means to develop gradually or to adapt. And “adaptation” is key to Darwin’s theory of evolution (or natural selection) where only the strong survive! We knew Obama believed in natural evolution; now we know he believes in moral evolution. And so do a majority of Americans.

Likewise, there are many in the Church who fear that if they do not adapt to the evolving standards, they will not survive. And so, as the Church in America finds itself in an increasingly secular world that rejects moral absolutes, many are evolving and adapting. But for those who believe in God's unchangeable standards, evolution is not an option. God says "I am the LORD, and I do not change” (Mal. 3:6).
Labels:
change,
change you can believe in,
church,
cultural wars,
culture,
evolution,
morality,
morals,
president Obama
Will the Real Gospel Please Stand up
“To Tell the Truth” was a 1950’s game show in which 3 contestants claim to be the same person—2 of whom, of course, are impostors. A panel of celebrities asked questions to determine who was telling the truth. After making their guesses, the emcee would say “will the real [Joe Smith] please stand up.”
The Apostle Paul warned of imposters who would come in to the church preaching a “different Gospel” (2 Cor. 11:4). One such imposter, for example, is the “Therapeutic” gospel, which promises personal fulfillment and self actualization. Or, another of today’s imposters is the “Liberation” gospel which claims that Jesus meant to liberate the masses from unjust economic, political, or social conditions. And then there are “Prosperity” and “Dominion” gospels, focusing followers on the things of earth and the interests of men.
Jesus warned that many would be taken in by the imposters in the end times: “On judgment day many will say to me, 'Lord! Lord! We prophesied in your name and cast out demons in your name and performed many miracles in your name.' But I will reply, 'I never knew you.'”(Mat 7:22-23). Can we discern the imposters or will we be surprised when the real gospel stands up!
The Apostle Paul warned of imposters who would come in to the church preaching a “different Gospel” (2 Cor. 11:4). One such imposter, for example, is the “Therapeutic” gospel, which promises personal fulfillment and self actualization. Or, another of today’s imposters is the “Liberation” gospel which claims that Jesus meant to liberate the masses from unjust economic, political, or social conditions. And then there are “Prosperity” and “Dominion” gospels, focusing followers on the things of earth and the interests of men.
Jesus warned that many would be taken in by the imposters in the end times: “On judgment day many will say to me, 'Lord! Lord! We prophesied in your name and cast out demons in your name and performed many miracles in your name.' But I will reply, 'I never knew you.'”(Mat 7:22-23). Can we discern the imposters or will we be surprised when the real gospel stands up!
Tuesday, May 8, 2012
Coffee, Doughnuts, and Worship
Before you accuse me of 20th century fundamental legalism, please hear my heart on this. I’m not talking about meaningless rules; nor would I want to restrict anyone’s freedom. No, I am speaking of the loss of something: the loss of un-distractedness, of undivided attention in our corporate gatherings.
While I understand our churches' objectives to be less culturally disparate, I fail to see how coffee and doughnuts add value to the worship experience. Paul was not discouraging Sunday morning coffee and doughnuts when he spoke these words, but listen to them as though he were. “I say this for your own benefit, not to lay any restraint upon you, but to promote good order and to secure your undivided devotion to the Lord” (1 Cor. 7:35). Of course the real issue is not coffee and doughnuts, but how each of us is undivided in devotion to the Lord—and not just on Sunday morning!
Labels:
culture,
devotion,
focus,
fundamentalism,
gain,
loss,
sanctification,
sanctify,
sanctuary,
undistracted,
undivided attention
Monday, May 7, 2012
Whatever happened to Silence?
I mentioned last week that Altha and I had visited a Greek Orthodox Monastery. The quiet and solitude was a stark contrast to 21st century noise-filled lifestyles. So accustomed to the non-stop sounds of TV, radio, iPods and cell phones, people find no place for silence. Moreover, there is the the mental “noise” of social networking, emailing, texting and tweeting.
When was the last time you heard silence?—the sound of nothing, being alone with your thoughts. Part of the purpose of a daily “quiet time” is to quiet your mind of distractions and open your spirit to hear from the Lord. In the late 1950’s A.W. Tozer wrote: “God is having a difficult time getting through to us because we are a fast-paced generation. We seem to have no time for contemplation. We have no time to answer God when He calls.” I wonder what Tozer would think about today’s digitally distracted generation?
To be “well-connected” used to mean that someone was connected by blood or close acquaintance with people of wealth and influence. Now it means you have a lot of apps on your iPhone. I think “well-connected” is an accurate way to describe someone who hears from God every day. But our digital connections are making it more difficult than ever to be still, and know God (Ps. 46:11).
When was the last time you heard silence?—the sound of nothing, being alone with your thoughts. Part of the purpose of a daily “quiet time” is to quiet your mind of distractions and open your spirit to hear from the Lord. In the late 1950’s A.W. Tozer wrote: “God is having a difficult time getting through to us because we are a fast-paced generation. We seem to have no time for contemplation. We have no time to answer God when He calls.” I wonder what Tozer would think about today’s digitally distracted generation?
To be “well-connected” used to mean that someone was connected by blood or close acquaintance with people of wealth and influence. Now it means you have a lot of apps on your iPhone. I think “well-connected” is an accurate way to describe someone who hears from God every day. But our digital connections are making it more difficult than ever to be still, and know God (Ps. 46:11).
Labels:
A. W. Tozer,
A.W. Tozer,
digital devices,
facebook,
hearing,
listen,
nothing,
quick to listen,
quiet time,
silent,
sound bite,
texts,
tweet
Friday, May 4, 2012
Has the 21st Century Church become a Den of Thieves?
Last Sunday, 41,000 fans packed Nationals Stadium in Washington, D.C., to hear a message of hope from Joel Osteen. Tickets were an average of $20 apiece. Then I received an email from Joel Osteen’s ministry advertising 80% off on all DVDs and books. Joel is not alone. He is part of marketplace mentality—a characteristic of modern church ministries—a 20th century phenomenon made possible by new technologies that allowed easy duplication of tapes (now CDs and DVDs) and booklets.

Jude warns that in the end times, there will be false teachers who “for pay, have rushed headlong into the error of Balaam.” Balaam's error was using his gift for monetary gain. Paul also warned of teachers who were seeking to make a profit from their ministry (Titus 1:11). I am by no means implying that everyone who sells a CD is a potential wolf in sheep's clothing. But when our prophets are making big profits, and when shepherds are getting rich off the sheep, we have to ask: is this yet another sign of the times?
Labels:
church,
end times,
false shepherd,
Joel Osteen,
last days,
signs of the times,
wolf
Thursday, May 3, 2012
No One Likes Austerity
Last weekend the Spanish took to the streets to protest government austerity measures. Citizen reaction to austerity laws in Greece and Italy earlier this year was the same. In corporate context, austerity means cutting expenses and reducing services. No one likes austerity.
The word “austere” means to be without comforts or luxuries, connoting self-denial, self-discipline, asceticism. This week, the word “austere” took on new meaning when Altha and I visited a Greek Orthodox Monastery in the Sonora Desert. As soon as we arrived, we knew we had entered a set-apart place. We were handed a brochure which said: “Due to the sanctity of this Holy place we kindly ask that you respect the quiet and solitude of the Monastery while on the grounds.” We spoke with a young monk (from Seattle) who explained the monastic lifestyle as one refraining from worldly comforts and pleasures, so that without distractions, they might practice Christian disciplines and meditations to bring them closer to Christ.
Your first reaction may be to dismiss the ascetic lifestyle as aberrant and extreme, but single-minded devotion to Jesus is not something reserved for desert dwellers. Jesus’ life on earth and that of all who followed Him was austere. Jesus demanded singular commitment from His disciples. By leaving their nets and boats—their most valued things in life—they demonstrated the heart disposition Jesus was looking for. Why then, do we suppose, 20 centuries later, that following Jesus demands any less of us?

Your first reaction may be to dismiss the ascetic lifestyle as aberrant and extreme, but single-minded devotion to Jesus is not something reserved for desert dwellers. Jesus’ life on earth and that of all who followed Him was austere. Jesus demanded singular commitment from His disciples. By leaving their nets and boats—their most valued things in life—they demonstrated the heart disposition Jesus was looking for. Why then, do we suppose, 20 centuries later, that following Jesus demands any less of us?
Wednesday, May 2, 2012
Walls
The Israeli army is building a wall to run along part of its border with Lebanon. Already having one on the Palestinian border, they will soon have one on their border with Egypt. Given the changing political climate, it is no wonder.
Throughout history, walls have been used to defend cities from potential aggressors. In the Bible, walls were the places of battle—the only thing that stood between a city and its enemies. Walls are therefore used metaphorically of security and safety (Isa. 26:1; 60:18). In America, we don't have walls around our cities, but we have walls around our homes, and walls on our borders. The walls of our houses are strong, thick, and insulated to keep things in (privacy) and keep things out (noise, heat, cold, unwanted people).
It seems to me that Israel’s actions might be used to remind The Church (the New Israel) that it must build strong walls to keep in solid doctrine and keep out worldly influence. As the last days get closer, there will be tremendous pressure for all peoples to let down their walls and move toward unity and acceptance. Christ followers will be pressured to accept religious pluralism. Metaphorically speaking, we ought to make sure we are building solid walls of truth to keep out the doctrines of demons and protects us, corporately and individually, against the fiery darts of Satan.
Throughout history, walls have been used to defend cities from potential aggressors. In the Bible, walls were the places of battle—the only thing that stood between a city and its enemies. Walls are therefore used metaphorically of security and safety (Isa. 26:1; 60:18). In America, we don't have walls around our cities, but we have walls around our homes, and walls on our borders. The walls of our houses are strong, thick, and insulated to keep things in (privacy) and keep things out (noise, heat, cold, unwanted people).
It seems to me that Israel’s actions might be used to remind The Church (the New Israel) that it must build strong walls to keep in solid doctrine and keep out worldly influence. As the last days get closer, there will be tremendous pressure for all peoples to let down their walls and move toward unity and acceptance. Christ followers will be pressured to accept religious pluralism. Metaphorically speaking, we ought to make sure we are building solid walls of truth to keep out the doctrines of demons and protects us, corporately and individually, against the fiery darts of Satan.
Labels:
battleground,
defend,
fire,
pluralism,
protection,
Satan,
security,
unity,
wall
Friday, April 27, 2012
Secret Sins of the Secret Service

But there is another meaning to the phrase secret sins, one more relevant to us. David says “who will acquit me of my secret sins [or hidden faults]” (Ps. 19:12). The common interpretation of “secret faults” is those that are hidden from the one who committed them, unconscious sins, sins of ignorance.
Augustine said: “Secret sins, sins which my conscience has been unable to detect, are like private conspirators. They must be hunted out or they may do deadly mischief; it is well to be much in prayer concerning them.” His words reveal the heart of a man who wants nothing to separate him from God. Likewise, David prayed “Search me, O God, and know my heart; test me and know my anxious thoughts. See if there is any offensive way in me” (Ps 139:23-24). It takes faith to pray that way. And that’s no secret.
Labels:
anxious,
hidden,
hide,
hiding place,
search me,
secret,
secret place,
sin
Thursday, April 26, 2012
What’s in a Name?
Yesterday, I heard a woman on CNN promoting women’s health care. As she continued speaking, I realized she was talking about the importance of assuring that birth control and abortion would always be made available to women. Wow! I thought. She has remarkably neutralized the issues of abortion and birth control (hot button ‘words’) simply by re-naming, or re-wording them as “women’s health care.” It is indeed a unique use of what-we-call ‘euphemism.’
A euphemism is a word or phrase which is used in order to make something that may have a bad connotation sound better. For example, our military invasion of Iraq was called a “peace effort.” Pornography is called “adult entertainment.” An unemployed person is “between jobs.” A public bathroom is a “restroom.” When a lady uses the toilet, she is “powdering her nose.” Used cars are “pre-owned.” A prison is a “correctional facility.”
This issue of “re-naming” was first brought to my attention with the California debate over gay marriage. Conservatives framed it as a moral issue. But when gay activists were successful in reframing it as one of civil rights, i.e., "Gay Rights," I knew they would eventually prevail. A euphemism may simply be polite speech, but it can also be a powerful tool to influence attitudes and values. Whoever controls the meaning of words can can control the people who use them.
A euphemism is a word or phrase which is used in order to make something that may have a bad connotation sound better. For example, our military invasion of Iraq was called a “peace effort.” Pornography is called “adult entertainment.” An unemployed person is “between jobs.” A public bathroom is a “restroom.” When a lady uses the toilet, she is “powdering her nose.” Used cars are “pre-owned.” A prison is a “correctional facility.”
This issue of “re-naming” was first brought to my attention with the California debate over gay marriage. Conservatives framed it as a moral issue. But when gay activists were successful in reframing it as one of civil rights, i.e., "Gay Rights," I knew they would eventually prevail. A euphemism may simply be polite speech, but it can also be a powerful tool to influence attitudes and values. Whoever controls the meaning of words can can control the people who use them.
Labels:
abortion,
birth control,
cultural wars,
gay marriage,
homosexuality,
name,
society
Wednesday, April 25, 2012
YouTube is a Terrible Place to Go to Church
As Millennial Christians find easy access to Bible commentary through websites, blogs and apps, you have to wonder what will happen to good ‘old fashioned’ Bible reading, study, and reflection and meditation.
When I was in school, my generation said, "Why read the book when you can read the Cliff's Notes?" There was no such thing as Bible Cliff’s Notes. Today you can purchase “The Bible for Dummies” anywhere. I am also concerned that daily online devotionals and Bible Q&A's are displacing sound teaching for Bible 'bites.’ Of course there’s a lot of good stuff on the internet, but there’s just as much bad stuff.
If they are not discerning, Millennials will be ripe for deception, easily intimidated by intellectual ‘scholars’ who despise the inerrancy of Scriptures. “in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons" (1 Tim. 4:1). And there’s plenty of that on the World Wide Web. Recent surveys show that many Millennial Christians do not participate in local church because they go to church online. I think Albert Mohler got it right when he said “YouTube is a terrible place to go to church.” Whatever happened to Sunday School and Wednesday night Bible study?
Tuesday, April 24, 2012
The Whole Economy could Collapse in One Hour
The Chinese are selling weapons to North Korea, and Russia to Iran and Syria. But that seems like small potatoes compared to the problems “across the pond.” Yes, Europe’s uncertain politics, weak economy, and unsustainable debt are front-page news again this morning—aggravating the stock market, a 100 point loss yesterday. “A crisis of apocalyptic proportions” is the way Poland’s foreign minister recently described the debt crisis in Europe. The Polish diplomat may be more precise than he realizes.
The whole world seems to be moving inevitably toward the apocalyptic “hour” described in Revelation, when the world’s entire economic system crashes: “for in one hour such great wealth has been laid waste, and the fruit you long for has gone from you, and all things that were luxurious and splendid have passed away from you and men will no longer find them” (Rev. 18:14, 17).

Because of regional (the EU) and international interdependence, a global marketplace, and digital interconnectivity, for the first time in world history, a “one hour” crash is possible. When the EU collapses, it will be like an economic sink hole that will pull every industrialized nation into it—and all within the course of “one hour.”
Labels:
crisis,
debt,
discerning the times,
economic collapse,
economy,
end times,
europe,
global recession,
last days,
russia,
syria
Monday, April 23, 2012
Evolution: the Greatest Paradigm Shift in Human History
Before Darwin introduced his ideas on evolution, there were few atheists. Men would look in to the Universe and see that everything had to have a supernatural origin. How else could you explain how things came into being? And that’s what Darwin did. He explained how man came into being without God. A product of the Age of Reason, he provided an alternative to God that gave people a reason not to believe. It was a paradigm shift unlike any other in human history. Satan had won a great victory. If there was a natural explanation for everything, how could anyone still believe in a supernatural God?
About the same time, Satan was raising up a generation of “enlightened” theologians who began examining the Bible through a “natural” lens. No longer would rational men accept its supernatural stories. Jonah swallowd by a whale, or the parting of the Red Sea were just primitive Hebrew stories, not unlike pagan mythologies. This, then, brought into question the reliability of all the historical records of the Old and New Testament. Their conclusion: the Bible was written by mere mortals—not by God-inspired authors. Score another one for the devil.
The Spirit-breathed inspiration and inerrancy of the Bible is no longer accepted in many Christian colleges and seminaries. Those that do are in the minority—and they are viewed as intellectual midgets. Within another generation or two, the remnant of people who still believe in the inerrancy and infallibility of the Bible will be so small that evangelicalism as we know it today may no longer exist.
About the same time, Satan was raising up a generation of “enlightened” theologians who began examining the Bible through a “natural” lens. No longer would rational men accept its supernatural stories. Jonah swallowd by a whale, or the parting of the Red Sea were just primitive Hebrew stories, not unlike pagan mythologies. This, then, brought into question the reliability of all the historical records of the Old and New Testament. Their conclusion: the Bible was written by mere mortals—not by God-inspired authors. Score another one for the devil.
The Spirit-breathed inspiration and inerrancy of the Bible is no longer accepted in many Christian colleges and seminaries. Those that do are in the minority—and they are viewed as intellectual midgets. Within another generation or two, the remnant of people who still believe in the inerrancy and infallibility of the Bible will be so small that evangelicalism as we know it today may no longer exist.
Labels:
age of enlightenment,
bible,
end times,
enlightened,
evangelical,
evangelism,
evolution,
humanism,
inerrancy,
infallibility,
inspire
Friday, April 20, 2012
Do you remember when Dancing was a Sin?
With the passing of Dick Clark, people my age are reminiscing over his popular dance show “American Bandstand.” I was not allowed to watch it. Dancing was sinful. But it wasn’t just Baptist fundamentalists that feared gyrating rock ‘n rollers; many conservative people resisted it. But Dick Clark made it acceptable by bringing a clean-cut, non-threatening image into American living rooms; girls on the show couldn't wear slacks or tight sweaters, and boys had to wear jackets and ties.
Dick Clark knew how to change a culture: it's called normalizing the abnormal. Traditionalists are threatened by new ideas. Just look at the resistance in countries under Islamic Law—Iran, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Pakistan.
In our society, on the other hand, "change" is normal. Unfortunately, all too many believers are ignorant or ambivalent about the impact of change. Things once considered immoral are being normalized. Couples cohabitating, even having children, without marriage, “hooking up”—the new phrase for promiscuity, and same-sex relationships are the norm. Looking back, dancing doesn't seem so bad after all. God forbid we should ever reach the point where we say that about today's cultural changes!
Dick Clark knew how to change a culture: it's called normalizing the abnormal. Traditionalists are threatened by new ideas. Just look at the resistance in countries under Islamic Law—Iran, Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, Pakistan.
In our society, on the other hand, "change" is normal. Unfortunately, all too many believers are ignorant or ambivalent about the impact of change. Things once considered immoral are being normalized. Couples cohabitating, even having children, without marriage, “hooking up”—the new phrase for promiscuity, and same-sex relationships are the norm. Looking back, dancing doesn't seem so bad after all. God forbid we should ever reach the point where we say that about today's cultural changes!
Labels:
"change you can believe in",
change,
cultural wars,
culture,
dancing,
fundamentalism,
immorality,
morality,
norms,
promiscuity,
sin
Wednesday, April 18, 2012
Does It Feel Like Things are Getting Out of Hand?
This week a Japanese bank announced it will be installing about a dozen automated teller machines that will scan customers' hands for identity. I have to hand it to the Japanese: they’ve certainly found a handy way to get cash. And besides that, no one will have to worry about their debit card falling into the wrong hands!
If this “hand scanning” thing catches on, it could change our vocabulary. For example, if your wife needs money to go shopping, she’ll say, “can you give me a hand?” And that homeless guy who sits in front of Lucky's will have a sign that reads, “I’m looking for a hand out.” And bank tellers may sound like cops when they say, “put your hands where I can see them.”
Now before this post gets completely out of hand, let me offer a more serious observation. It seems to me this biometric scan has a somewhat apocalyptic ‘feel’ to it. And while it may not be a chip implant, it could advance Antichrist’s agenda toward a global marketplace (“mark of the beast”). But it also occurs to me that the more things in this world get out of hand, the earthlings will be employing technology to take matters into their own hands. But we have peace, knowing that our life and times are in His hand (Ps. 31:15), the one who opens His hands and meets our needs (Ps. 145:16).
If this “hand scanning” thing catches on, it could change our vocabulary. For example, if your wife needs money to go shopping, she’ll say, “can you give me a hand?” And that homeless guy who sits in front of Lucky's will have a sign that reads, “I’m looking for a hand out.” And bank tellers may sound like cops when they say, “put your hands where I can see them.”
Now before this post gets completely out of hand, let me offer a more serious observation. It seems to me this biometric scan has a somewhat apocalyptic ‘feel’ to it. And while it may not be a chip implant, it could advance Antichrist’s agenda toward a global marketplace (“mark of the beast”). But it also occurs to me that the more things in this world get out of hand, the earthlings will be employing technology to take matters into their own hands. But we have peace, knowing that our life and times are in His hand (Ps. 31:15), the one who opens His hands and meets our needs (Ps. 145:16).
Tuesday, April 17, 2012
And They Call Us “Unenlightened”
Reading “Dear Abby” in the Sunday paper (don’t laugh!), I was struck by the word she used to describe a man who disapproved of a friend's homosexual marriage. She said the man was “unenlightened.”
There are two rather different meanings to the word “enlightened.” The first is “to give information or understanding to someone in order to free them from ignorance, prejudice, or superstition.” According to this definition, an “enlightened” person would embrace religious pluralism while anyone holding to 'Jesus only' exclusivity would be “unenlightened.” (Call me “unenlightened.”)
For this, we are indebted to the “Age of Enlightenment” when it was presumed that man’s power of reason was better at explaining the world than an outmoded theistic, biblical worldview. Ever since, Christians have been relegated to the status of the "unenlightened" (still living in the “Dark Ages”).
But the second meaning of the word “enlightened” is “to give spiritual or religious revelation.” Accordingly, Paul prays we will be enlightened by the Spirit's revelation of God. (Eph. 1:17-18). In contrast, Paul describes people who walk according to the values of this world as blind and darkened in their understanding (Eph 2:2; 2 Cor. 4:4; Eph. 4:18). And they call us "unenlightened"?
There are two rather different meanings to the word “enlightened.” The first is “to give information or understanding to someone in order to free them from ignorance, prejudice, or superstition.” According to this definition, an “enlightened” person would embrace religious pluralism while anyone holding to 'Jesus only' exclusivity would be “unenlightened.” (Call me “unenlightened.”)
For this, we are indebted to the “Age of Enlightenment” when it was presumed that man’s power of reason was better at explaining the world than an outmoded theistic, biblical worldview. Ever since, Christians have been relegated to the status of the "unenlightened" (still living in the “Dark Ages”).
But the second meaning of the word “enlightened” is “to give spiritual or religious revelation.” Accordingly, Paul prays we will be enlightened by the Spirit's revelation of God. (Eph. 1:17-18). In contrast, Paul describes people who walk according to the values of this world as blind and darkened in their understanding (Eph 2:2; 2 Cor. 4:4; Eph. 4:18). And they call us "unenlightened"?
Labels:
age of enlightenment,
blind,
blind spot,
darkness,
enlightened,
pluralism,
revelation,
understand,
worldview
Friday, April 13, 2012
She never worked a day in her life
The U.S. presidential campaign got a jolt yesterday when Democratic strategist Hilary Rosen set off a national debate by saying that Ann Romney, the mother of five, had “never worked a day in her life.” The next day Ann Romney tweeted back: “I made a choice to stay home and raise five boys. Believe me, it was hard work.” Is it just another day in the life of American politics, or is it something more? I think the issue of a how a woman defines herself has touched a nerve.
You see, I don’t think Hillary Rosen meant that “mothering” is not work. But Ms. Rosen’s definition of “work” is tied to her sense of a woman’s worth—evidently by paychecks, promotions, and professionalism. Another famous Hillary (Clinton) touched this nerve with her emotionally-charged statement: “I suppose I could have stayed home and baked cookies, but what I decided to do was fulfill my profession.” You can see how these Hillary’s define a woman’s worth—professional fulfillment.
This identity crisis is not new. In 1975, in her book “A Woman’s Worth,” Elaine Stedman wrote: “The American woman remains in crisis. The propaganda designed to incite restlessness, if not revolution, is continually being repackaged to appeal to her insecurities, sense of worthlessness, and covert or overt desire for power...” How prophetic of Elaine. This may seem like just another skirmish in the culture war, but I believe it is more. This issue is a major component of the war against Christian values in America.
You see, I don’t think Hillary Rosen meant that “mothering” is not work. But Ms. Rosen’s definition of “work” is tied to her sense of a woman’s worth—evidently by paychecks, promotions, and professionalism. Another famous Hillary (Clinton) touched this nerve with her emotionally-charged statement: “I suppose I could have stayed home and baked cookies, but what I decided to do was fulfill my profession.” You can see how these Hillary’s define a woman’s worth—professional fulfillment.
This identity crisis is not new. In 1975, in her book “A Woman’s Worth,” Elaine Stedman wrote: “The American woman remains in crisis. The propaganda designed to incite restlessness, if not revolution, is continually being repackaged to appeal to her insecurities, sense of worthlessness, and covert or overt desire for power...” How prophetic of Elaine. This may seem like just another skirmish in the culture war, but I believe it is more. This issue is a major component of the war against Christian values in America.
Labels:
abortion,
crisis,
cultural wars,
end times,
equal rights,
fulfillment,
wage war,
war,
worth,
worthy
Thursday, April 12, 2012
Is Your Head in the Clouds?
Do you feel like you’re living “under a cloud” or that there is a “cloud hanging over you?” The idea of these ‘cloud’ idioms is darkness, confusion, fear and dread. I know there are people reading this who feel like they are living under a dark cloud covering that will never let up.
Do you remember the account of Jesus’ transfiguration? Peter’s reaction at seeing Jesus with Moses and Elija was to “do” something: "Let us make three tabernacles." But he had hardly got the words out of his mouth when he, James and John were overshadowed by a cloud, from which they heard the voice of God saying, "This is my Son... Listen to him!" (Matt. 17:5). God told Peter it was not a time for doing; it was a time for listening.
While that was a uniquely “divine” cloud, I see an analogy. When you are in a cloud, God is with you, and will speak a word of encouragement. Though I can't tell you your cloud will be lifted, I can say the darkness will fade when you hear His voice. And you will have joy. Think about this: Jesus ascended to heaven in a cloud, will return in a cloud, and will take us to heaven in a cloud (Acts 1:9; Luke 21:27: Rev. 11:12). Now that’s a cloud you want to get your head in.
Do you remember the account of Jesus’ transfiguration? Peter’s reaction at seeing Jesus with Moses and Elija was to “do” something: "Let us make three tabernacles." But he had hardly got the words out of his mouth when he, James and John were overshadowed by a cloud, from which they heard the voice of God saying, "This is my Son... Listen to him!" (Matt. 17:5). God told Peter it was not a time for doing; it was a time for listening.
While that was a uniquely “divine” cloud, I see an analogy. When you are in a cloud, God is with you, and will speak a word of encouragement. Though I can't tell you your cloud will be lifted, I can say the darkness will fade when you hear His voice. And you will have joy. Think about this: Jesus ascended to heaven in a cloud, will return in a cloud, and will take us to heaven in a cloud (Acts 1:9; Luke 21:27: Rev. 11:12). Now that’s a cloud you want to get your head in.
Labels:
cloud,
depressed,
depression,
divine,
doing,
endurance,
fiery trials,
fullness of joy,
head in the sand,
heaven,
heavenlies,
joy,
Peter,
trials,
tribulations
Tuesday, April 10, 2012
I thought I knew
Last week I just happened to stumble across the story of Naaman, the account of a Syrian army captain who had acquired leprosy. Having travelled far to see Elisha, he thought he would receive royal treatment; he thought he would be healed dramatically. Instead, Elisha sent a servant out to meet him who told him to plunge in the muddy Jordan 7 times. Naaman refused. It was beneath him. Fortunately for him, his servants convinced him to do what Elisha had required (2 Kings 5:13). He was healed.
Naaman’s story has taught me something about having preconceived ideas. Before his cleansing, Naaman “thought he knew” how God works. And in that, he almost lost God's blessing. We can get into a lot of trouble thinking we know.
After retiring from my government career nearly 4 years ago, I thought my life would follow a certain familiar pattern. But God had other plans. I wish I could tell you I was quick to embrace God’s way, that I didn't see it as an interruption of 'my' plans. But God was graciously pushing me to new heights by introducing things beyond my control; I was kept from “resting on my laurels” by carefully calculated “divine disturbances,” that interfered (thank God) with 'my' plans. I thought I knew. Ha!
Naaman’s story has taught me something about having preconceived ideas. Before his cleansing, Naaman “thought he knew” how God works. And in that, he almost lost God's blessing. We can get into a lot of trouble thinking we know.
After retiring from my government career nearly 4 years ago, I thought my life would follow a certain familiar pattern. But God had other plans. I wish I could tell you I was quick to embrace God’s way, that I didn't see it as an interruption of 'my' plans. But God was graciously pushing me to new heights by introducing things beyond my control; I was kept from “resting on my laurels” by carefully calculated “divine disturbances,” that interfered (thank God) with 'my' plans. I thought I knew. Ha!
Labels:
disturbing,
healing,
repentance,
rest,
taking all thoughts captive,
thoughts
Friday, April 6, 2012
Small Things
“Do not despise small beginnings” (Zechariah 4:10). You may be familiar with this verse without knowing the back story. At the end of Israel’s 70-year captivity, Zerrubabel returned with a small group of Jews to re-build the Temple. It was harder than he expected; he got discouraged. And, people disparaged a structure that would never be as grand as Solomon's. For 12 years, the work stopped. Then the word of the Lord came to him through Zechariah to start again, saying, do not despise small beginnings, or small things.
Our generation loves BIG things—monster houses, mammoth malls, and mega churches. No one talks of doing “small things” for God. We like big, attention-grabbing projects and campaigns. But if we despise (regard as negligible or worthless) small things, we may miss the very thing God is doing around us.
The life and ministry of Jesus demonstrates the significance of small. Born in a small shed, surrounded by chickens, sheep, cows, donkeys—despised things—He would confound the wise. Hailing from the tiny town of Nazareth, with a small group of provincial men from a politically insignificant nation, Jesus changed the world, saying, if you have faith the size of a mustard seed, you can move mountains (Matt. 17:20). Do not despise small things. That seems to be where God does some of His best work!
Our generation loves BIG things—monster houses, mammoth malls, and mega churches. No one talks of doing “small things” for God. We like big, attention-grabbing projects and campaigns. But if we despise (regard as negligible or worthless) small things, we may miss the very thing God is doing around us.
The life and ministry of Jesus demonstrates the significance of small. Born in a small shed, surrounded by chickens, sheep, cows, donkeys—despised things—He would confound the wise. Hailing from the tiny town of Nazareth, with a small group of provincial men from a politically insignificant nation, Jesus changed the world, saying, if you have faith the size of a mustard seed, you can move mountains (Matt. 17:20). Do not despise small things. That seems to be where God does some of His best work!
Wednesday, April 4, 2012
If you speak the truth, you will be hated
When Kirk Cameron (Growing Pains, Fireproof), a conservative evangelical Christian, was a guest on Piers Morgan’s show last month, he was asked about his views on homosexuality. Not surprisingly, Cameron said it is unnatural and detrimental to the foundations of civilization, alluding to gay marriage. His comments were immediately condemned by GLAAD as hate speech.
Hate speech is defined as any communication disparaging a person/group on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, gender, disability, sexual orientation, nationality, or religion. In an increasingly secular (amoral) world, our biblical morals are becoming more offensive. Thankfully, however, saying offensive things is protected by the First Amendment, unless the words are considered defamation, in which case, hate speech becomes a hate crime (a felony). And therein lies the danger: in a culture that is hostile to the Bible, expressing our biblical beliefs may some day become a hate crime.
Albert Mohler says, “Without a doubt, many Christians manage to be offensive for reasons other than the offense of the gospel. This is to our shame. Nevertheless, there is no way for a Christian to avoid offending those offended by Jesus Christ and His cross (1 Cor. 1:23). The truth claims of Christianity, by their very particularity and exclusivity, are inherently offensive.” (Culture Shift) To Mohler's remarks, I would add this: whatever we may say, we must always be sure we are “speaking the truth in love.” (Eph. 4:15).
Hate speech is defined as any communication disparaging a person/group on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, gender, disability, sexual orientation, nationality, or religion. In an increasingly secular (amoral) world, our biblical morals are becoming more offensive. Thankfully, however, saying offensive things is protected by the First Amendment, unless the words are considered defamation, in which case, hate speech becomes a hate crime (a felony). And therein lies the danger: in a culture that is hostile to the Bible, expressing our biblical beliefs may some day become a hate crime.
Albert Mohler says, “Without a doubt, many Christians manage to be offensive for reasons other than the offense of the gospel. This is to our shame. Nevertheless, there is no way for a Christian to avoid offending those offended by Jesus Christ and His cross (1 Cor. 1:23). The truth claims of Christianity, by their very particularity and exclusivity, are inherently offensive.” (Culture Shift) To Mohler's remarks, I would add this: whatever we may say, we must always be sure we are “speaking the truth in love.” (Eph. 4:15).
Monday, April 2, 2012
Easter Eggs, Bunnies and Beautiful Crosses
It's that time of year for the Seeker-Friendly churches to have their annual Easter Egg hunts. What the Easter Bunny and Easter eggs have in common is a mystery to me. I believe these icons of Easter must be terribly offensive to our Lord: they make a mockery of this holyday. Do most Christians think these things are harmless?
In the same vein, jewelry stores offer special seasonal sales on diamond and ruby studded silver and gold crosses—shiny symbols of Christian faith. But are they? The cross of Jesus' day was an instrument of torture and death. When Jesus told His followers they needed to pick up their crosses, they understood His meaning.
How many nominal Christians wear a cross to identify their faith without fully understanding its significance? It seems to me a glamorous jeweled gold cross can be as much an offense to Christ as the Easter Bunny. In speaking of those who do not take the death and resurrection (and the blood) of Jesus seriously, the writer of Hebrews says they have insulted the Spirit of grace for treating the blood of the covenant as a common thing. (Heb. 10:29) Is the Easter Bunny harmless? I don't think so.
In the same vein, jewelry stores offer special seasonal sales on diamond and ruby studded silver and gold crosses—shiny symbols of Christian faith. But are they? The cross of Jesus' day was an instrument of torture and death. When Jesus told His followers they needed to pick up their crosses, they understood His meaning.
How many nominal Christians wear a cross to identify their faith without fully understanding its significance? It seems to me a glamorous jeweled gold cross can be as much an offense to Christ as the Easter Bunny. In speaking of those who do not take the death and resurrection (and the blood) of Jesus seriously, the writer of Hebrews says they have insulted the Spirit of grace for treating the blood of the covenant as a common thing. (Heb. 10:29) Is the Easter Bunny harmless? I don't think so.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)